MIKE BUSCH
COMMENTARY / SAVVY AVIATOR
Trust, but Verify
Before you approve any costly or invasive repair to your aircraft, make sure the discrepancy is real
ARGUABLY THE WORST PART of being an aircraft owner is the
ordeal of putting your plane in the shop every 12 calendar
months and then bracing yourself for bad news. Over the past
four years, my company has managed more than 700 annual
inspections and more than 6,000 lesser maintenance events,
so it’s a safe guess we’ve dealt with tens of thousands of
mechanical discrepancies. Sometimes the bad news is painful
and costly to the aircraft owner. But surprisingly often it turns
out to be nothing more than a false alarm.
A couple of months ago, for example, a client’s single-engine airplane went into a big, well-known Florida service
center for its annual ordeal. Within hours, the shop reported
that cylinder No. 3 measured 38/80 on the compression test,
with air audible at the exhaust tailpipe. (This was a
Continental engine, and the master orifice no-go limit was
46/80.) The mechanic attempted to “stake” the No. 3 exhaust
valve but was unable to improve the reading. The shop said
the No. 3 cylinder needed to be removed and sent to a cylinder
shop to be re-valved and honed, and then reinstalled with a
new set of piston rings. The estimated cost of this work was
quoted at $2,200.
We checked the airplane’s downloaded digital engine mon-
itor data and found that the No. 3 EGT appeared normal, with
no hint of the slow, rhythmic oscillations characteristic of a
burned exhaust valve. We asked the shop to inspect the No. 3
exhaust valve with a borescope, and it reported back that the
inspection results were “inconclusive.” Further questioning
revealed that the exhaust valve had a symmetrical appearance
under the borescope (see Figure 1), with none of the lopsided,
green-tinged appearance characteris-
tic of a leaking exhaust valve.
The shop said the No. 3 cylinder
needed to be removed and sent
to a cylinder shop to be re-valved
and honed, and then reinstalled
with a new set of piston rings.
We suggested the following word-
ing in his logbook entry: “Borescope
inspection of cylinder No. 3 and digital